The Pope ends the letter with a direct threat, "Whoever does not do this will be ipso facto suspended a divinis and will lose his current office".

If you think that the Pope has reacted so harshly to the diocese for having shielded paedophile priests as in Mexico, where the pontiff showed his mercy and compassion even to the priest with HIV who sexually abused more than 30 children, then you are mistaken again.

The Nigerian diocese in question has requested that they have a bishop from their own clan who can understand their problems. The appointment of this bishop was made by the predecessor of the current Pope. The notoriously conservative church refused their request and imposed on them a bishop from a rival clan.

At the outset it may look like an enlightened church fighting ethnic tribalism in an African nation. Indeed, the Pope and the controversial bishop have made tangential reference to tribalism though the Pope has pointed out that his concern is more about the disobedience of Nigerians to the authority of Rome rather than ‘tribalism’.

However, the church itself is an ethnicity-centered institution. In the powerful Papal conclave of 2013, which elected the Pope, through the cardinals, Asia had only 10 cardinals, Africa only 11, North America 20 and South America 13. However, Italy alone had 28 cardinals and the rest of European countries, 32. That has always been the case. Hence, despite the much trumpeted "person from outside Europe for the first time being elected as Pope", the person was carefully chosen to be from an Italian family in South America. And in Africa, the church has always played ethnic ‘divide and control’ which in Rwanda resulted in one of the worst genocides witnessed by the current generation.

What is happening to the Nigerian diocese is a repeat performance that happens everywhere. Catholic theology students from around the world are taught from the very beginning one axiomatic truth of his or her theological world: 'Roma locuta est; causa finita est' (Rome has spoken; the case is closed). With local spiritual traditions destroyed, the diocese would ultimately have to go back to the church.

The destruction of the local community strength is another way of Rome to make sure that the indigenous traditions do not surface again with its spiritual content.

In India, the Catholic communities are restricted from adopting local spiritual traditions by branding the latter as ‘Brahminical’ corruptions, and by steadily cultivating fear psychosis through atrocity literature. It is an interesting irony, though not unexpected, that the Left in India is an active participant in this theological imperialism of Rome.

So what we have here is an international body dominated by one state-ethnic group – Italians – deciding to deny the same privileges to Africans when they want their diocese to have a bishop of their own origin and their own choice.

Using religion and amassing the natural and human resources of the local believers in various continents, the church flatly refuses population based representation in Papal election, making it an empire controlled by cardinals of Italian diocese. So in post-colonial countries wherever the church grows stronger, it does not hesitate to impose an inquisitional stranglehold on the herds, using the diminished power of the dioceses and the inability of the concerned state power in negotiating with Rome.

The way church deals with paedophile priests with kid gloves in countries like India, while at least taking some compensatory actions in countries like the US (though even there justice in full sense has been effectively denied), is a standing proof to this almost racist dimension of the church which is also its integral part.

This is also the reason why every indigenous culture and community, particularly those belonging to the post-colonial nations, should fight against the spread of the church in their regions.

Indigenous Culture

Get Swarajya in your inbox.